Expectancy is your profit percentage per win multiplied by your win rate minus your loss percentage per loss multiplied by your loss rate. I will use an example of Expectancy from Dr. Van K. Tharp’s Book: Trade your way to Financial Freedom:
Expectancy = (Probability of Win * Average Win) – (Probability of Loss * Average Loss) Expectancy = (PW*AW) less (PL*AL)
PW is the probability of winning and PL is the probability of losing.
AW is the average gain (win) and AL is the average loss
So let’s do an example using another basic approach (assume $12,500 per position, a $100,000 portfolio using 1% equity risk):
If my trades are successful 40% of the time and I realize an average profit of 20% but I lose an average of 5%, my expectancy is $625 per trade.
(0.4 * $2,500) – (0.6 * $625) = $1,000-$375 = $625
I lose 60% of the time yet I show a profit of $625 per trade. If I have a system that produces 65 trades per year, I would realize an annual gain of $40,625 (hypothetical scenario). A 40% gain on the original $100,000 (minus all commissions, fees, taxes and compounding).
Let’s look at the calculation one more time using only percentages:
PW: 40%
AW: 20%
PL: 60%
AL: 5%
(40% * 20%) – (60% * 5%) = 5.00%
What this tells me is that I have a positive expectancy of 5% or $625 per trade from the original $12,500. It doesn’t mean that I will make $625 on every single trade but my system will average a profit of $625 per trade over the course of a year with a combination of winners and losers. I can always make more trades or fewer trades in a year so my total profit will be adjusted accordingly.

May 27, 2008 at 5:50 pm
Duc, I’ve been meaning to go back and brush up on my Tharp book. This is like the third reminder for me today, so I better go get the book off the shelf and start reading.
May 27, 2008 at 6:07 pm
Wood,
Interesting day on your blog. It is responsible for my revision on some of the basics with regard to systems/expectancy.
jog on
duc
May 27, 2008 at 6:17 pm
I guess that is good. Depends on the revisions, I guess!
May 27, 2008 at 6:23 pm
Wood,
Indeed it is good. Quantifying your edge, or expectancy, provides a more realistic look at whether you are not kidding yourself with regards to an edge.
jog on
duc
May 27, 2008 at 6:41 pm
The system I am working with is showing an expectancy of 2.5 with a win ratio north of 80%.
Of course we expect this win ratio to fluctuate a bit, but I expect it to say above 70%.
May 27, 2008 at 6:57 pm
Wood,
Yes, I’ve been watching the development of your *system*…looks pretty good.
jog on
duc
May 27, 2008 at 7:02 pm
For those interested in “Woods”system, here is a link to the development and some ideas regarding a mechanical system.
http://www.ibankcoin.com/woodshedderblog/index.php/2008/05/26/system-quest-implementing-rsi2-strategy/
jog on
duc